v0 to Astro or Next.js
Make a v0 project a site your team can run
A v0 project is already Next.js. I offer a cleaned-up Next.js codebase your team can run, or a move of the public pages to Astro. Either path starts with the content model, which components stay interactive, and how marketing edits. Same audit, same handover.
Fixed price from $5,000 typically 4–6 weeks 30 days of hypercare code in your name
The Everbase Stack
Astro or Next.js, with Sanity, on Cloudflare or Vercel.
What moves
What actually migrates.
| What you have | What happens | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The repository | Stays put Does not move, on purpose. The old platform keeps this because it is the thing it is good at, and the new front end reads from it. | There is nothing to scrape from the published site. The existing project gives me the components, the assets, the routes and the integrations to work from. |
| React components | Reconfigure The same thing, set up again. Nothing is recreated, but it has to be pointed at the new site by hand. | Components that genuinely need state or browser behavior can stay React inside Astro. Presentational ones are usually simpler as Astro components that ship no client runtime at all. |
| Routes | Rebuild Made again in the new codebase. The old version is a reference, not an import. | Public routes become Astro pages and layouts. Application routes can stay application surfaces where there is no reason to move them. |
| Publishing content | Move Comes across as it is. The content survives the move and the work is transporting it, not remaking it. | Copy, FAQs, resources and testimonials come out of the component files and into content collections or a CMS, depending on who publishes. |
| Server behavior | Stays put Does not move, on purpose. The old platform keeps this because it is the thing it is good at, and the new front end reads from it. | API calls, authentication and database access are judged one at a time. Moving the marketing front end does not require rewriting a working backend. |
| URLs | Reconfigure The same thing, set up again. Nothing is recreated, but it has to be pointed at the new site by hand. | Every known public address is inventoried, preserved where practical and deliberately redirected where the routing changes. |
Hard parts
Where this migration gets complicated.
- 01
React is both useful code and unnecessary runtime
The project holds genuinely interactive components beside large sections that only render text, images and links. Treating both the same either throws away code worth keeping or ships more application runtime than the site needs.
- 02
Generated structure reflects how the project was discovered
A project built through prompts accumulates routes, abstractions and component boundaries as the requirements appear. Before that structure is carried forward, somebody has to decide which of those decisions still make sense now that the site is understood. Generation history is not information architecture.
Process
How the migration works.
-
Audit
Routes, React components, client directives, server behavior and content, sorted into website and application.
-
Rebuild
Public routes become Astro pages, and React stays only on the components that genuinely hold state.
-
Migrate
Publishing content out of the JSX and into the model, addresses preserved or redirected, every route checked.
-
Hand over
The repository, the migration map and documentation written for somebody who was not here.
Included
What is included.
-
Design rebuild
Rebuilt as components, not approximated.
-
Responsive development
Desktop, tablet and mobile, built and checked.
-
CMS architecture
Collections and fields mapped before build.
-
Content migration
Migrated and checked against the source.
-
Asset migration
Collected, compressed and rehosted.
-
Forms and integrations
Tested through to the final record.
-
URL coverage
Every known public address preserved or deliberately redirected.
-
Metadata and canonicals
Preserved wherever possible.
-
Search footprint preservation
URLs inventoried before and checked after.
-
Pre-launch QA
Forms, templates and old URLs verified.
-
Post-launch support
30 days of indexing and traffic checks included.
After those 30 days, Continuous development is the optional way to keep shipping: $1,000 a month for the Everbase Agent, or $3,500 a month for the Partner Program (human QA on every deploy and one active request at a time), pause or cancel any month.
Search visibility can move during a migration. The goal is to preserve what search engines already understand, and to catch what changed quickly after launch.
And it is yours at the end. The repository sits in your organization rather than mine, the handoff documentation is written for somebody who was not here, and nothing about the project requires me: another developer or your own team can operate it.
Editing
Get the words out of the components.
-
01
Content Collections, in the repository
For a team that publishes rarely and is happy in a pull request. The content is files beside the code, typed and checked at build time, with no service to pay for and nothing to keep running. It stops suiting you the day somebody outside engineering needs to publish without help.
-
02
Sanity
For a team that publishes regularly, or where the person writing is not the person deploying. Editors get a real interface, the model is explicit, and the site reads it at build time. It is another system to configure and pay for, and the modeling is the part that decides whether editors can work on their own.
-
03
No CMS at all
For a site whose pages change a few times a year. Everything lives in components, changes go through the same review as any other change, and there is no editorial layer to maintain. Honest for a small site, and the wrong answer the moment a blog is added.
Content Collections against a headless CMS, and how the choice is made.
Proof
A migration is not finished when the new site looks right.
-
01 Codebase
A codebase your team owns
Components, routes and styles rebuilt deliberately, not cleaned up from exported markup.
Verified by Repository and component structure
-
02 Site
Everything accounted for
Collections, content, metadata and existing addresses checked against the source.
Verified by Source inventory and migration checks
-
03 Systems
Handoffs that actually arrive
Forms, analytics and CRM checked at their destination rather than at the button.
Verified by Submissions, events and records
The migration is complete when these pass, not when the homepage looks right.
The figures above show the report's shape. Yours are counted from your own site.
Maintenance
Keep using AI. Give it a settled architecture.
The important part is not that an agent can write code. It is that the project is structured well enough for its changes to be understood, reviewed and reversed.
-
Marketing
Editor or AI assistant CMS Preview Publish
On the headless CMS answer above. Choose content collections instead and this lane runs through the repository and the review with the developers, which is exactly why that decision comes before the rebuild rather than after it.
-
Developers
Branch Components and routes Review Deploy
The same workflow as any other repository, which is what makes a second developer able to pick it up.
-
Coding agents
Project instructions Branch Review Deploy
Coding agents use the same repository and review process as developers. Instructions explain the patterns; tests and a human review check the changes before release.
Integrations
Changing the frontend doesn't mean changing your stack.
-
HubSpot
Forms that land in the CRM as records, confirmed by the server rather than by the browser.
CRM
-
Sanity
A content model the marketing team edits and the build renders, with a defined preview and publishing path.
CMS
-
Google Analytics
Traffic and conversions measured against the routes the site actually has.
Analytics
-
Stripe
Checkout handled by Stripe, with the webhook as the record that decides what happened.
Payments
-
Mailchimp
Signups that reach the audience exactly once, whatever the visitor clicks.
Email
-
Zapier
Site events handed to the automations the team has already built.
Automation
Other guides
Coming from somewhere else?
Let me plan your next step.
I can scope a migration. Send a brief and I will reply by email with next steps.